bom

Why Australians Are Furious at the Bureau of Meteorology’s New Website – And What’s Being Done

It started with a few grumbles, then escalated into a full-blown digital storm. The Bureau of Meteorology (BoM), Australia’s trusted weather authority, recently rolled out a major redesign of its website — a multimillion-dollar overhaul meant to modernise how millions access critical weather data. But instead of praise, the update sparked widespread public backlash, with users calling it confusing, slow, and even dangerous in extreme weather events.

Now, the federal government has stepped in, demanding fixes after a torrent of complaints flooded social media and official channels. Hashtags like #changeitback trended across platforms, and meteorologists, emergency responders, and everyday Aussies voiced frustration over what they say is a flawed user experience during life-or-death situations.

This isn’t just about aesthetics or personal preference. For many Australians, especially those in cyclone-prone regions, farmers, pilots, and emergency services, accurate, accessible weather information can mean the difference between safety and disaster. So why did such a high-stakes redesign go so wrong? And what happens next?

Let’s unpack the controversy, the response, and what it means for how we get our weather updates.

The Backlash That Broke the BoM Website

In late October 2025, the Bureau of Meteorology launched its new $4.1 million website, promising a “modern, user-friendly platform” with improved navigation, faster load times, and mobile optimisation. On paper, it sounded like progress. In practice, it quickly became a source of national frustration.

Within days, social media exploded. Users reported: - Missing radar loops — including the beloved “rain radar” that shows real-time storm movement - Slower performance compared to the old site - Hard-to-find critical warnings, especially during severe weather events - Poor mobile usability, despite claims of being mobile-first - Confusing layout that buried essential data behind layers of menus

One user on X (formerly Twitter) wrote:

“Trying to check if my kid’s school will close due to a storm? Good luck finding the warning. I spent 10 minutes clicking through icons like I was playing Where’s Wally?”

Another said:

“As a farmer, I rely on BoM data daily. The new site doesn’t show soil moisture maps clearly. It’s like they forgot who actually uses this stuff.”

The backlash wasn’t limited to individuals. Emergency management agencies, aviation operators, and even local councils expressed concern that the redesign could hinder rapid decision-making during cyclones, bushfires, and floods.

The hashtag #changeitback, started by a Canberra-based weather enthusiast, went viral. Within a week, it had been shared over 20,000 times — a clear signal that this wasn’t just a minor tech glitch, but a public trust issue.

Government Steps In: “Fix It Now”

The pressure reached Canberra fast.

On Tuesday, October 28, Environment and Water Minister Murray Watt confirmed he had requested an urgent meeting with BoM’s acting CEO, Dr Peter Stone, to address the growing crisis.

According to official statements reported by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), Minister Watt told Dr Stone:

“The Bureau should consider this feedback and, where appropriate, adjust the website's settings as soon as possible.”

He added that the government was taking the complaints “very seriously,” noting that “lives could be at risk” if the public couldn’t access timely weather warnings.

The minister didn’t order a full rollback — but he made it clear that immediate improvements were non-negotiable. This intervention marked a rare moment of direct political oversight over a technical upgrade at a national science agency.

By Friday, BoM issued a public apology. In a statement, the Bureau acknowledged “challenges” with the rollout and said it was listening to user feedback — a shift from its earlier stance, which had been more defensive.

“We didn’t make this decision lightly,” the Bureau said, according to The Guardian. “We understand the frustration, and we are working to restore key features and improve usability.”

Among the first fixes: reinstating the classic rain radar loop, which had been removed or hidden in the new design. For many users, this was the breaking point — the rain radar is one of the most-used tools on the BoM site, especially in eastern and northern Australia during storm season.

A Timeline of the BoM Website Crisis

Here’s how the situation unfolded, based on verified reports from ABC News, The Canberra Times, and The Guardian:

This timeline shows how quickly a technical upgrade can spiral into a public policy and trust crisis — especially when it involves essential public services.

Why the Rain Radar Matters So Much

To understand the depth of the backlash, you need to understand the cultural and practical significance of the rain radar in Australia.

For decades, the BoM rain radar has been more than just a weather tool — it’s a national ritual. Every time a storm rolls in, millions of Australians check the radar loop to see where the rain is, how fast it’s moving, and whether their suburb will be hit.

It’s used by: - Farmers planning irrigation or harvesting - Parents deciding whether to cancel outdoor events - Cyclists and runners timing their workouts - Emergency crews tracking flood risks - Aviation and marine operators avoiding hazardous conditions

The old radar was simple: a loop of animated images showing rain intensity over the past hour, with clear timestamps and easy-to-read colour scales. The new version buried this under new UI elements, required extra clicks, and in some cases, didn’t load at all on mobile devices.

As one meteorologist told The Guardian:

“The rain radar isn’t just data — it’s a shared experience. When you take that away, you’re not just changing a website. You’re breaking a connection.”

The removal of this familiar interface felt like a betrayal of user trust — not just a UX flaw, but a symbolic misstep.

The BoM’s Defense: “Give It Time”

Despite the backlash, the Bureau hasn’t fully backed down. In a series of statements, it has defended the redesign, arguing that the new site is more accurate, more secure, and built for the future.

In an internal memo obtained by The Guardian, BoM staff were told the new site was “not a sh*tshow,” and that users needed time to adapt.

Key arguments from the BoM include: - The new site uses updated data models with higher resolution - It’s designed to integrate with future tech, like AI forecasting and IoT devices - It improves accessibility for visually impaired users with better screen reader compatibility - It’s more resilient to cyber threats, with enhanced security protocols

Dr Peter Stone, acting CEO, said:

“We know change can be hard. But we believe this platform will serve Australians better in the long term — if we can get the user experience right.”

Still, critics argue that usability shouldn’t be sacrificed for innovation — especially when the stakes are so high.

As one user quipped on Reddit:

“I don’t care if your algorithm predicts the next cyclone to the second