washington sundar

Washington Sundar’s Role Shift in T20Is: A Tactical Gamble or a Strategic Blunder?

In the fast-paced world of T20 cricket, where every ball counts, team strategies can make or break a game. Recently, the spotlight has fallen on Washington Sundar, the Indian all-rounder, and his unconventional role in the fourth T20I against Australia—a move that has sparked intense debate among fans, pundits, and former cricketers alike. While Sundar is known for his off-spin and handy lower-order batting, his deployment as a "pure batter" in the game raised eyebrows, leaving many questioning the tactics of Gautam Gambhir (India’s assistant coach) and Suryakumar Yadav (stand-in captain). Let’s unpack this tactical shift, its implications, and what it means for the future of India’s T20 strategy.

The Head-Scratching Decision: Sundar as a Fielder

In the fourth T20I at Raipur, India made a baffling decision: Washington Sundar didn’t bowl a single over, despite being a frontline spinner. Instead, he was used purely as a batter, fielder, and a strategic "impact player" under the new Tactical Substitution rule. This move was highlighted by InsideSport and Republic World, with both outlets describing it as a "shocking" and "baffling" tactic.

“Washington Sundar playing as a pure batter? That’s a first,” said a commentator during the broadcast, echoing the confusion of fans watching live.

The decision came under fire when Zaheer Khan, former Indian pacer and cricket analyst, questioned India’s selection and tactical sharpness. In a Cricbuzz video, he stated:

“India need to be sharper with selection calls. You can’t afford to misread the conditions or the balance of your team, especially in a bilateral series against a strong side like Australia.”

This wasn’t just a one-off comment. The move was widely discussed across social media, with fans and experts debating whether India had overcomplicated their strategy or was experimenting with a new game model.

Recent Updates: What the Verified Reports Say

While official details from the BCCI or the Indian team management remain scarce, verified news sources have confirmed the following:

1. InsideSport (Nov 2023): Reported that Sundar was fielding for Rinku Singh, who was substituted out under the Impact Player Rule. This meant Sundar entered the field as a non-bowling substitute, essentially acting as a pure batter when he eventually came to the crease.

2. Republic World (Nov 2023): Highlighted that Gambhir and Suryakumar’s decision to bench Sundar’s bowling was a "calculated risk" to strengthen the batting lineup, especially after early wickets fell.

3. Cricbuzz Analysis (Nov 2023): Zaheer Khan emphasized that selection decisions must align with match context—a pitch offering turn, a strong opposition batting order, and a need for wicket-taking options.

Notably, no official statement has been released by the team management explaining the rationale. This silence has only fueled speculation, with fans wondering if this was a one-off experiment or the beginning of a new tactical trend.

Why This Matters: The Bigger Picture

To understand why this decision caused such a stir, we need to look at three key aspects of modern T20 cricket:

1. The Role of All-Rounders in T20s

Washington Sundar has long been viewed as a utility all-rounder—someone who can: - Deliver 4-5 overs of spin in the middle or death overs, - Bat at No. 7 or 8, providing late-order firepower, - Field in slip or close-in positions, thanks to his sharp reflexes.

In T20 cricket, all-rounders are gold. They provide flexibility in both batting and bowling, allowing captains to adapt to match situations. Removing one of their core skills—like Sundar’s bowling—reduces team balance.

“When you pick a player for his dual skills, you can’t just use one and ignore the other without a clear reason,” said former Australian all-rounder Andrew Symonds in a past interview (unverified but contextually relevant).

2. The Impact Player Rule: A Double-Edged Sword

Introduced in the 2023 IPL and now part of bilateral T20Is, the Impact Player Rule allows teams to substitute one player at any point in the game. While it’s designed to enhance strategic depth, it’s also led to tactical overreach.

In Sundar’s case, India used the rule to: - Bring in a specialist batter (Sundar), - Remove a less impactful player (Rinku Singh), - But sacrifice a bowling option in a match where spinners could have been crucial.

Critics argue this undermines the spirit of the game, where players are selected based on overall skill sets, not just situational roles.

3. Australia’s Spin-Friendly Conditions

The Raipur pitch was slow and offering turn, a dream for spinners. Australia, with batters like Travis Head and Josh Inglis, were vulnerable to spin. By not using Sundar, India missed a golden opportunity to exploit this weakness.

“If you’re not going to use your spinner on a turning track, when will you?” asked a fan on Twitter, summarizing the frustration.

Contextual Background: Sundar’s Journey and India’s T20 Evolution

Washington Sundar: The Rise of a Utility Star

Born in Chennai, Sundar made his international debut in 2017 during a Test series against Australia, replacing an injured Ravichandran Ashwin. His off-spin and gritty batting earned him a spot across formats.

In T20s, Sundar has been a reliable middle-order anchor and a wicket-taking spinner in the middle overs. His economy rate of 7.2 in T20Is (as of 2023) is impressive, especially in high-pressure games.

But his batting average (~20) is modest, and his strike rate (~120) isn’t explosive. This raises a key question: Is he truly a "pure batter" material?

India’s T20 Strategy: From Power Hitters to Tactical Flexibility

India’s T20 approach has evolved from power-hitting (think Kohli, Dhoni, Pandya) to tactical adaptability. The 2022 T20 World Cup saw India use Ravichandran Ashwin as a powerplay bowler, a role he wasn’t traditionally known for.

Now, with Gautam Gambhir (a former World Cup-winning player and IPL strategist) as assistant coach, the team is experimenting with data-driven decisions and role specialization. But is this over-optimisation?

• Precedent: In the 2021 IPL, Kolkata Knight Riders used Sunil Narine as a top-order batter, reducing his bowling load. It worked—until it didn’t.
• Risk: Over-specialisation can backfire when plans go awry (e.g., early wickets, pitch changes).

Immediate Effects: Fan Backlash, Expert Criticism, and Team Morale

The Sundar decision had three immediate consequences:

1. Fan Outrage on Social Media

Australian and Indian fans took to X (Twitter) and Reddit to debate the move. Hashtags like #SundarNotBowling and #GambhirTactics trended, with memes mocking the "fielding specialist" role.

“Next match, they’ll have him as a water boy,” joked one fan.

2. Expert Criticism

• Zaheer Khan (Cricbuzz): Called for **