FDA bans food dye

That Red Stuff in Your Candy? It's Getting Banned

You know that bright red colour in some candies, drinks, and even some medications? Well, it's about to become a lot less common. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has officially banned the use of red dye No. 3 in food and ingested drugs, a move that's been a long time coming. This ban, while specific to the U.S., has implications for food production and consumption far beyond their borders, including right here in Canada. Let's break down what this means for you.

Why the Ban Now?

The FDA's decision to ban red dye No. 3, also known as erythrosine, comes after years of research and debate. According to multiple news sources, including CTV News, the FDA took this step more than 30 years after scientists first raised concerns about links between the dye and potential health issues. NBC News reports that the dye has been linked to behavioural problems in children and cancer in animals.

This isn't the first time Red No. 3 has been under scrutiny. In fact, the FDA banned its use in cosmetics back in 1990. The current ban extends this prohibition to anything we eat or swallow. This is largely due to something called the Delaney Clause, a federal law that requires the FDA to ban any food additive found to cause cancer in humans or animals. The Associated Press notes that this clause was a key factor in the FDA's decision.

Recent Updates: A Timeline of Events

Here's a look at how this ban unfolded:

• 1990: The FDA bans Red No. 3 in cosmetics due to potential cancer risks.
• Recent Years: Increased research and public advocacy groups, like Consumer Reports, petition the FDA to ban the dye in foods.
• Wednesday (Current Year): The FDA officially announces the ban on Red No. 3 in food and ingested drugs.

This recent action is a significant development, and it's been a long time coming. The timeline shows a consistent concern about the safety of this dye, culminating in the recent ban.

A Bit of History: Where Did This Dye Come From?

Red dye No. 3, or erythrosine, is a synthetic food coloring. It's been used for decades to give food products a vibrant red or pink hue. It's not just in candy; you might find it in things like cough syrups, baked goods, and even some processed meats.

The dye's history is intertwined with the broader history of food additives. For many years, food manufacturers have used artificial colours to make products more visually appealing. However, over time, research has revealed potential risks associated with some of these additives, including Red No. 3. The fact that this dye was banned in cosmetics decades ago, yet remained in our food, highlights a complex history of food safety regulations and industry practices.

Immediate Effects: What Does This Mean for You?

The FDA’s ban means food manufacturers in the U.S. will need to reformulate their products to remove Red No. 3. This change will likely take some time to implement fully, as companies adjust their production processes. While this ban is specific to the U.S., its impact will ripple outward.

For Canadian consumers, this means:

• Potential for Product Changes: Many food products sold in Canada are manufactured in the U.S. or use ingredients sourced from the U.S. So, we can expect to see changes in the formulation of some of our favorite treats.
• Increased Awareness: This ban raises awareness about food additives in general. You might start paying closer attention to the ingredient lists of the products you buy.
• No Immediate Ban in Canada (Yet): As of now, Canada hasn't announced a ban on red dye No. 3. However, it's very possible that Canadian authorities will review this situation, given the FDA's decision and the potential health concerns.

Looking Ahead: What's Next?

The ban on red dye No. 3 is part of a larger conversation about food safety and the use of artificial additives. Here's what we might see in the future:

• More Scrutiny of Food Dyes: This ban could lead to increased scrutiny of other artificial food dyes, with health authorities and consumer groups calling for more research and regulation.
• Shift Towards Natural Alternatives: Food manufacturers might increasingly seek natural alternatives to artificial food colours.
• Global Impact: The FDA’s decision could prompt other countries to reconsider their regulations on food additives.
• Consumer Awareness: Consumers will likely become more aware of the ingredients in their food, leading to greater demand for transparency and healthier options.

This situation serves as a reminder that food safety regulations are not static. They evolve as new research emerges and as we become more aware of the potential risks associated with certain ingredients. While the FDA’s ban is a win for consumer health in the U.S., it's a reminder that we all need to stay informed about what we’re eating, and to advocate for changes that protect our health. We'll be watching closely to see if Canada follows suit, and what the long-term effects of this ban will be.